A film by Tom Tykwer, Andy and Lana Wachowski.
Here
I go, I will start with the theme. I’m probably not the
first one having this perspective and it is possibly a pretty obvious one but I’m
going to say it. I feel like what Cloud Atlas tries to do is no more
dimensional and human than Beats of the Southern Wild or even on a total different
level, a film like A Royal Affair, even Killing Them Softly, now close to us. The
majority of us realize, at some point or another, that we are nothing but these
little pieces breathing in this mysterious universe that we won’t ever figure
it out. Like Hushpuppy says. Like many characters from Cloud Atlas suggest. We
believe what we believe. Some believe in reincarnation and those same people
also believe that there’s no such thing as an environmental crisis and they
don’t believe that we will eventually be submerged by water if we don’t reduce
with the CFC’s. Yes, I believe there is a natural order, in maybe whatever you
want to look at, and by what we do and by what we don’t do we will always have
consequences to face. With A Royal Affair we see a cycle, I believe. We can see
the meaning and the importance of truth. With Killing Them Softly, a solitary
man believes we are all on our own. It’s a good point, it is also the truth, I
believe. America is nothing but a business, he says; it also seems a good
point. But I also believe that if the people, the community, didn’t voted for
Obama they would be way more fucked than they are now. Yes, they’re still
fucked, we all are, but I feel like it could be worse for the people in
general. So what’s the truth, what’s the matter, what’s the point in all of
this? Our actions do matter. Greed can bring consequences and I could go on. These questions are
always good to be asked from time to time, to think it over; to wake us up a
little. Cloud Atlas is or should be or tries to be a vehicle for those
questions and maybe bring some answers. One thing is sure, it tells us
something.
I didn’t dislike
Cloud Atlas, but I didn’t love it either. I won’t say it’s too ambitious, than
so should be the book, I haven’t read it either and this shouldn’t be used as a
reason, I think it would be unfair. But I feel like it becomes, I hate to say
it, but maybe it tries too much without significant heart or maybe it has too
much heart and fails the impact. You know what? Maybe it is the word ambitious.
If I would have to
choose a word to define Cloud Atlas it would have to be connectivity. I think
it’s an essential theme, but these characters, the narratives through time, I
feel it becomes a burden. And here’s my personal stand on it, I didn’t connect
with it. There’s so much to connect that I forget to actually connect. It
doesn’t mean in any way I want to take credibility from the film, I’m only
speaking from the heart and I don’t want the film to be no less admired for it,
because I do admire the effort. I think in this line, I will or should end up
talking about the bridge between cinema and life, because this is probably where
the doubtful questions of Cloud Atlas rely and it is always a good thing.
Because like my friend said when she left the theater, this film is a multitude
of a lot of stuff, or a multitude of drops, really, I don’t recall what she
said exactly but you get the point!
No comments:
Post a Comment