My first film of the year.
In cases like Les
Misérables, of an adaptation of sorts, you fall in this pattern of stating
where you stand in it. And I am not only starting that way, but also
acknowledging it at the same time! It’s pretty tiring! Anyway, I haven’t heard
of Les Misérables until a few months ago, I haven’t seen the play, nor didn’t
know anything about the story and the novel. But I did end up knowing pretty
much everything about the film, that a lot of gay men already loved the play,
while others don’t, that there’s a lot of love to the film from women and
straight men too. So above all, I was extremely curious about this film, curious
to see Anne Hathaway ‘Oscar’ winning performance and the live singing.
These are always
difficult times to watch films like Les Miz because of the heavy talk behind it.
I think this is a great
epic film. I was impressed by its magnitude, by the work done by everyone in
the art department, by the sound work, both in editing, mixing and whatever
other levels. I was especially in awe by the acting. I think they all deserve
their praise because it is truly an amazing thing to watch. There were some
beautifully singed moments, they devoted themselves to these characters and you
can see that through their performances. They are remarkable. I wasn’t in
anyway disturbed by the camera movements and scales, the close ups
became part of the film. It was fascinating to watch Anne Hathaway singing I
Dreamed a Dream in one sequence (even though there was a moment where you could
see her white teeth, oh I had to mention this!). This was the moment I was the
most affected by, I become more inside the film, when I finally felt something
I guess. Hugh Jackman transcends in this film. I think Russell Crowe was a fit
choice, playing the tough guy, and I think he’s really good too, but I
understand the other critics towards him, I would say that it’s his voice that
doesn’t really fit with the rest. If people want to give Oscars to these guys
then give them the awards. I don’t really care.
So I’ve been
mentioning the highlights of this film, but what I’m going to say next may not
make much sense, but even though I was in some ways amazed by this film I wasn’t
amazed by its story. I am not fluent in the French History but I don’t think
this story is that magnificent and significant and not that definable in some
parts.
It’s impressive how
my friend kept crying compulsively throughout the entire film, even though she
had already seen the play. It’s impressive (and unpleasant?) how I heard
people actually singing along full of passion. The story is deeply dramatic, so
much that I didn’t even felt like smiling with the comic timing from the
Thénardier family. I was also really focused trying to find the themes of this
film, trying to find my positions in the story and the character’s own motives. Because I’m
not even going to mention the novel and such, first I never read it and second
what’s the matter it’s what’s in this film. But really, the story isn’t that
great is it? I think that the intricacies about this story, I know they must exist,
don’t transcend significantly in this film, but at the same time, it is that
important for the film? I really don’t know, although it probably
should. What I know is that my friend cried, so much I could hear the sniffing,
the sobbing, and the chair shaking…I didn't share a tear.
My question about Les
Miz has to be, to the ones who love it so deeply, who went to see the play
eight times, why they love it so much, why it is so special? I know that in many ways this can be a
really silly question.
No comments:
Post a Comment